A few decades ago, when income tax hit 98%, most high earners went into tax exile. Now the top rate of tax is a reasonable 50%, although it’s due to drop to 40% (also reasonable) as soon as the government can swing it. Tax on fuel is an unreasonable 66% but people hit by the artificially high price can’t afford to fill their tanks, let alone decamp. Ministers justify the unjustifiable by saying they need to raise another £1.5bn. As I keep saying, traffic system reform offers kind cuts in the tens of billions. So what are ministers waiting for? I appreciate the environmental argument in favour of fewer journeys, but CO2 cuts achieved that way are ludicrously small compared with what could be achieved by letting traffic filter instead of stop and restart at gas-guzzling signals. And the greening of cars is at last well under way.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Martin Cassini on 20mph again
- francisgoode on Worst peacetime disaster
- francisgoode on Deference be damned
- RichardX on 20mph again
- Martin Cassini on Speed
Meta
Blogroll
Compare a crossroads with TL’s and the USA system of a four way stop. Why can’t it work? Of course it can. TL’s protect Road Engineers from being sued. They’re the easy option.
A new motorway junction on the M50 in Dublin had TL’s installed on the overhead roundabout section because ” we always end up doing it, so might as well do it when we build it” !!!!!
Can you attribute that quote? Ironically, there is no legal requirement for priority or signal control, so engineers can not be sued for displaying lights-out signs on poles, or removing lights and priority markings entirely. As road-users, we have a duty to proceed with care. Even more ironically, it’s the very system of priority and signal control which stimulates inappropriate speeds and sets the stage for dangerous conflict in the first place.