Highways to Hell

This was a programme on Radio 4 on 4 Jan 2026, produced by Jonathan Brunert. Like every other BBC programme I’ve seen or heard about traffic congestion, it missed the point – that the main cause of congestion (and “accidents”!) is the system of priority and signal control. Instead it went on for half-an-hour about the easy target, roadworks. One thing they didn’t say is that roadworks are often minor – no more than a parked car in length – and don’t need those idiotic temporary traffic lights.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Reducing “accidents”

So the government is unveiling a new batch of legislation with a view to a 70% reduction in the 30,000 annual casualty toll by 2035.

Most of it is to do with tighter regulation. Yet the avoidable casualty toll could be cut to virtually zero in a few simple steps. Most involve deregulation and empowerment of the individual.

1. Change the basic rule of the road from priority to equality.

2. All road-users are equal. But some – the vulnerable – are more equal than others! The vulnerable includes pedestrians, especially children and blind people. The bigger the vehicle, the greater the onus for road safety. So if a cyclist hits a pedestrian, the cyclist is automatically liable. If a car hits a pedestrian or cyclist, the car driver is automatically liable. If a lorry hits a car, the lorry driver is liable.

3. Re-educate drivers, and rewrite the rulebook and the driving test. The basic rule is now to take it more or less in turns, and give way to others – on foot or on wheels – who were there first.

4. In the absence of a bridge or flyover, make junctions all-way give-ways.

5. Re-engineer roads to express a cooperative playing-field rather than a competitive killing-field.

The new rulebook could be written on one page: 1. Drive on the left. 2. Take it in turns/ give way to others who were there first. 3. Have a nice day.

Speed doesn’t kill. It’s inappropriate speed, or speed in the wrong hands that can kill. On busy streets, especially if children are around, proceed at walking pace. On the open road, within reason, choose your own speed.

Use the inside lane except when overtaking. This has been the Highway Code for at least 60 years, yet too many drivers ignore it. Middle-lane blockers cause congestion and accidents, but it’s their victims who get the blame.

Almost universally, legislators and commentators blame drivers for “accidents”. But most accidents are not accidents. They are events contrived by the anti-social rules of the road.

It’s the rules that need changing. Changing the rules – above all, replacing priority with equality – will transfigure the public realm and usher in an era of peace on our roads.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Pitiful analysis

The Today Programme, 11 August 2025. Discussion prompted by government announcing that 3-year eye tests are to be introduced for drivers aged 70+. The BBC wheeled in the usual spokesperson, Edmund King, formerly with the RAC, now “President” of the AA.

His recipe for making roads safer? More police in cars to enforce regulation. Six month ban on same-age passengers for young drivers who have just passed the driving test.

There was nothing about reforming the driving test by including, among other things, virtual reality training to drum home the dangers of inappropriate speed. Nothing about changing the basic rule of the road from priority to equality. No criticism of the system of coercive control, which gives rise to all the regulation that fails to make roads safe.

He talked about a percentage reduction in “accidents”, while my reform agenda, which Today has never aired, would eliminate accidents completely where regulation plays a part. That’s practically all the time, since the misguided rules of the road set the stage for “accidents” to happen in the first place.

Justin Webb just thanked King, as if that was all there was to say on the subject. Pitiful. You can bet it will soon be Sir Edmund King.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Bureaucracy kills the joy

One of my themes is how over-regulation makes life on the roads a misery when it could be a pleasure. Bureaucracy too can kill the joy. From Freedom for Drivers Foundation:

The FT on planning impediments to a major congestion-cutting project:

“Lower Thames Crossing has cost £1.2bn even before construction starts. The scheme to build a 14-mile road and tunnel to connect Kent and Essex has become a totem of our snarled-up planning system, in which ventures are tied up with years of delays and mountains of expensive compliance documents.

The planning document for the project — the first wholly-new Thames river crossing east of London for 60 years — runs to 359,070 pages, while it employs around 150 staff and an eight-strong management team.”

This is another example of UK management incompetence with overpaid consultants creaming off enormous fees and delaying projects …

FT article in full: https://www.ft.com/content/917d4b7f-318e-46fe-ba44-664551ebcf13

My comment: Ludicrous/depressing/wasteful indeed. What was that story I read a while ago about a project that was into 6 figures of paperwork, 8 figures of outlay on consultants, yet not even started, while Norway built a bridge over a wide inlet within a year of it being proposed … something like that. Do we suffer from a “can’t do” attitude? On the plus side, a stretch of the A303 at Sparkford has just been completed and it’s great.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Peace on the roads?

The way to achieve peace on our roads is not through regulation or technology.

It’s through a change in the rules from priority to equality. Arrive first? Go first, whether you’re on foot or on wheels. In the absence of bridge or flyover, let all junctions, and streets for that matter, be all-way give-ways.

The driving test must be reformed in line with the sociable culture of equality.

No-one gets a driving licence without cycling proficiency and a rider’s licence. Exceptions for the disabled.

Make the driving test much harder, to include skid pan experience and virtual reality training to inculcate the danger of inappropriate speed.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Old post

Just came across an old blogging site I used to use. It doesn’t seem fully functional, which isn’t surprising as it’s 16 years since I wrote this post (dated 2.3.2009):

Depressing announcement from the Association of Chief Police Officers. They propose average speed cameras instead of traffic calming measures in built-up areas to deter “speeding”. You can understand the rationale, but isn’t it misguided to extend state control at the expense of personal responsibility?

Speeding is a fabricated crime, like jaywalking. It’s not speed that kills, but inappropriate speed, or speed in the wrong hands.

Don’t policymakers realise that people behave worse when herded and hounded, and better when free to act according to commonsense and context?

Is it time to start installing traffic lights at cashpoints, and speed cameras on pavements, or time to start treating road-users as grown-ups?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Equality Streets

When the regulatory framework of traffic control is removed, as when traffic lights break down, we rediscover our humanity and make common cause. As soon as we are free from the coercive control that prevents infinite filtering opportunities and expressions of fellow feeling, the traffic and the milk of human kindness begin to flow.

To support the sociable interaction that blossoms when we’re free of regulation and free to use our own judgement, these elements are required:

New rules of the road and a new driving test, based on equality for all road-users.

Roads and streets re-designed to express equality.

On Equality Streets, all road-users are equal, but some – the vulnerable – are more equal than others.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The power of platforms

The commotion over Allison Pearson’s non-hate crime investigation by Essex Police for a deleted tweet highlights the unequal power enjoyed by those with a public platform. In her critique of police time wasted on a thought crime instead of real crime echoes identical objections by drivers who fall prey to the extortion racket otherwise known as “speeding”. You are driving in perfect safety but are zapped by a hidden copper wielding a concealed radar gun. Don’t the Police have more important things to do? we cry, slapped with points and fines for the non-crime of contravening an arbitrary limit that has nothing to do with context. While Pearson gets five-star, expenses-paid legal representation – resulting in a Police retraction, case dismissal and a change in the law – Jill and Joe Bloggs suffer abuse at the hands of a system that ignores their silenced screams. Yes, even Courts forbid any challenge to statutory law. While the powerful overturn vexatious law, the masses must submit to it.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Drop in the ocean

The AA calls for graduated driving licences for young drivers with a 6 month moratorium on carrying passengers their own age. It’s a gesture in the right direction but a drop in the ocean. We need wholesale reform of the rules of the road and the driving test. The system should be based on equality for all road-users, with the vulnerable more equal than others. Drivers should learn the dangers of speed and the beauty of tolerance. As a basis for road-user interaction, sociable self-control would avoid the “need” for vexatious regulation and prompt safe, empathic, environmentally-friendly driving.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Falling on deaf ears

Annual casualties on our roads are equivalent to more than one Grenfell a day. Yet while Grenfell gets blanket media coverage, 30,000 equally avoidable road casualties – given that my umpteenth pitch to the Press has just been ignored – are unnewsworthy. Hard not to conclude that the media accept the carnage on our roads with indifference. In Your Car No-one Can Hear You Scream! was an early title for a pitch to TV. Seems that no-one can hear me scream from this blog either.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment