Traffic system reform according to AI search

Into my search engine, now assisted by AI, I entered “traffic system reform”. This came up:

“The UK government is implementing major reforms to road safety legislation, including mandatory eye tests for older drivers and a potential reduction in the drink-drive limit. These changes aim to improve road safety and address rising concerns about driver health and impaired driving.”

Nothing about the real reform that I bang on about, that addresses the causes of our man-made road safety and congestion problems. The search brings up only the blinkered vision of the authorities. Further delving brought up more nibbling around the edges of existing policy, fiddling while the world continues to burn under the current egregious system.

The UK government is undertaking significant reforms to enhance road safety and improve traffic management. These reforms are designed to address long-standing issues related to driver health, impaired driving, and overall road safety.

Key Reforms: mandatory eye tests for older drivers. Additional assessments for conditions such as dementia are also being explored. Reduction in Drink-Drive Limit.

A new Road Safety Investigation Branch will analyse collision patterns to inform prevention strategies.” Will they take priority (=inequality) into account? Whats the betting?

The government plans to consult on introducing a minimum learning period for new drivers to improve their skills.” – This is the only element that sounds of potential value.

Additional Initiatives: Traffic Regulation Orders (TROs). Local authorities can implement temporary, experimental, or permanent traffic restrictions through TROs.” – Restrictions – the only thing that floats their boat.

A new traffic light rating system has been introduced to assess how well local councils manage road conditions, focusing on pothole repairs and maintenance practices.

Conclusion. These reforms represent a comprehensive approach to improving road safety in the UK, addressing both driver behaviour and infrastructure management. The government aims to create a safer environment for all road users through these initiatives.”

Comprehensive? Pitiful.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Lollipops

In Brecht’s play, Galileo chooses an agreeable old age rather than torture and death at the hands of an outraged papacy. So he recants his finding that the Earth is round. 

His disciple, Andreas, laments: “Pity the world that is without heroes.” 

Galileo replies, “No, pity the world that is in need of heroes.”

People have voiced regret that lollipop man, Reg Brown, 91, is retiring. But what should sadden us, and make us seek change, is the diabolical system that makes roads dangerous in the first place. If we lived by equality instead of lived and died by priority, the onus for safety would be on the driver. Toddlers wouldn’t need to learn age-inappropriate road safety drill, and we wouldn’t need” lollipop men and women to save children from drivers schooled in the delinquent rules of the road.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Delinquent rules produce delinquent fools

Sunday 8 Feb 2026. I was on this courtesy crossing when a van driver cut me off and yelled, “Wtf do you think you’re doing!” I said I’m on a crossing. “It’s not a f+g zebra, so I don’t have to stop!” In the heat of the moment I swore back. He started moving off, so I carried on crossing behind him. Suddenly he reversed, then drove off. Only when I felt a stinging sensation in my arm and took off my anorak did I realise his rear door handle had cut me. I’d made a note of his registration, and reported the incident, but it’s not worth taking to court. As I’ve said before, I blame drivers less than I blame the delinquent rules of the road that turn some drivers into delinquents. Given the civilised protocol of Equality, all road-users would be equal, with the vulnerable more equal than others. You wouldn’t need lights or crossings. Drivers would learn to proceed carefully in urban settings and give way sociably to other road-users, especially pedestrians, who were there first.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Cutting stop-go traffic – AI or Equality Streets?

Google develops AI “to tackle some of society’s biggest challenges in a responsible way. For example, we use AI to:

  • Support efforts to curb climate change, like reducing stop-and-go traffic to lower vehicle emissions.

Equality without traffic control (except for multi-lane intersections at busy times) produces natural flow instead of stop-start. Maybe Google’s AI will do the job, though my way is easier, cheaper, and it’s available now.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Highways to Hell

This was a programme on Radio 4 on 4 Jan 2026, produced by Jonathan Brunert. Like every other BBC programme I’ve seen or heard about traffic congestion, it missed the point – that the main cause of congestion (and “accidents”!) is the system of priority and signal control. Instead it went on for half-an-hour about the easy target, roadworks. One thing they didn’t say is that roadworks are often minor – no more than a parked car in length – and don’t need those idiotic temporary traffic lights.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Reducing “accidents”

So the government is unveiling a new batch of legislation with a view to a 70% reduction in the 30,000 annual casualty toll by 2035.

Most of it is to do with tighter regulation. Yet the avoidable casualty toll could be cut to virtually zero in a few simple steps. Most involve deregulation and empowerment of the individual.

1. Change the basic rule of the road from priority to equality.

2. All road-users are equal. But some – the vulnerable – are more equal than others! The vulnerable includes pedestrians, especially children and blind people. The bigger the vehicle, the greater the onus for road safety. So if a cyclist hits a pedestrian, the cyclist is automatically liable. If a car hits a pedestrian or cyclist, the car driver is automatically liable. If a lorry hits a car, the lorry driver is liable.

3. Re-educate drivers, and rewrite the rulebook and the driving test. The basic rule is now to take it more or less in turns, and give way to others – on foot or on wheels – who were there first.

4. In the absence of a bridge or flyover, make junctions all-way give-ways.

5. Re-engineer roads to express a cooperative playing-field rather than a competitive killing-field.

The new rulebook could be written on one page: 1. Drive on the left. 2. Take it in turns/ give way to others who were there first. 3. Have a nice day.

Speed doesn’t kill. It’s inappropriate speed, or speed in the wrong hands that can kill. On busy streets, especially if children are around, proceed at walking pace. On the open road, within reason, choose your own speed.

Use the inside lane except when overtaking. This has been the Highway Code for at least 60 years, yet too many drivers ignore it. Middle-lane blockers cause congestion and accidents, but it’s their victims who get the blame.

Almost universally, legislators and commentators blame drivers for “accidents”. But most accidents are not accidents. They are events contrived by the anti-social rules of the road.

It’s the rules that need changing. Changing the rules – above all, replacing priority with equality – will transfigure the public realm and usher in an era of peace on our roads.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Pitiful analysis

The Today Programme, 11 August 2025. Discussion prompted by government announcing that 3-year eye tests are to be introduced for drivers aged 70+. The BBC wheeled in the usual spokesperson, Edmund King, formerly with the RAC, now “President” of the AA.

His recipe for making roads safer? More police in cars to enforce regulation. Six month ban on same-age passengers for young drivers who have just passed the driving test.

There was nothing about reforming the driving test by including, among other things, virtual reality training to drum home the dangers of inappropriate speed. Nothing about changing the basic rule of the road from priority to equality. No criticism of the system of coercive control, which gives rise to all the regulation that fails to make roads safe.

He talked about a percentage reduction in “accidents”, while my reform agenda, which Today has never aired, would eliminate accidents completely where regulation plays a part. That’s practically all the time, since the misguided rules of the road set the stage for “accidents” to happen in the first place.

Justin Webb just thanked King, as if that was all there was to say on the subject. Pitiful. You can bet it will soon be Sir Edmund King.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Bureaucracy kills the joy

One of my themes is how over-regulation makes life on the roads a misery when it could be a pleasure. Bureaucracy too can kill the joy. From Freedom for Drivers Foundation:

The FT on planning impediments to a major congestion-cutting project:

“Lower Thames Crossing has cost £1.2bn even before construction starts. The scheme to build a 14-mile road and tunnel to connect Kent and Essex has become a totem of our snarled-up planning system, in which ventures are tied up with years of delays and mountains of expensive compliance documents.

The planning document for the project — the first wholly-new Thames river crossing east of London for 60 years — runs to 359,070 pages, while it employs around 150 staff and an eight-strong management team.”

This is another example of UK management incompetence with overpaid consultants creaming off enormous fees and delaying projects …

FT article in full: https://www.ft.com/content/917d4b7f-318e-46fe-ba44-664551ebcf13

My comment: Ludicrous/depressing/wasteful indeed. What was that story I read a while ago about a project that was into 6 figures of paperwork, 8 figures of outlay on consultants, yet not even started, while Norway built a bridge over a wide inlet within a year of it being proposed … something like that. Do we suffer from a “can’t do” attitude? On the plus side, a stretch of the A303 at Sparkford has just been completed and it’s great.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Peace on the roads?

The way to achieve peace on our roads is not through regulation or technology.

It’s through a change in the rules from priority to equality. Arrive first? Go first, whether you’re on foot or on wheels. In the absence of bridge or flyover, let all junctions, and streets for that matter, be all-way give-ways.

The driving test must be reformed in line with the sociable culture of equality.

No-one gets a driving licence without cycling proficiency and a rider’s licence. Exceptions for the disabled.

Make the driving test much harder, to include skid pan experience and virtual reality training to inculcate the danger of inappropriate speed.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Old post

Just came across an old blogging site I used to use. It doesn’t seem fully functional, which isn’t surprising as it’s 16 years since I wrote this post (dated 2.3.2009):

Depressing announcement from the Association of Chief Police Officers. They propose average speed cameras instead of traffic calming measures in built-up areas to deter “speeding”. You can understand the rationale, but isn’t it misguided to extend state control at the expense of personal responsibility?

Speeding is a fabricated crime, like jaywalking. It’s not speed that kills, but inappropriate speed, or speed in the wrong hands.

Don’t policymakers realise that people behave worse when herded and hounded, and better when free to act according to commonsense and context?

Is it time to start installing traffic lights at cashpoints, and speed cameras on pavements, or time to start treating road-users as grown-ups?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment