More evidence of WMD (D&D)

At the Asda junction in Hereford, two crashes on consecutive days at traffic lights, those weapons of mass distraction (danger and delay). Here’s one, witnessed by Sue Powell.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Spanner in the works

Another attempt to sum up what I’m on about.

The spanner in the works of the traffic system is priority. It imposes unequal rights-of-way and creates conflict between priority and non-priority traffic (including foot traffic).

Priority – for main roads, or to the right at roundabouts – flouts the common law practice of taking it in turns based on time of arrival.

Priority puts “inferior” side roads and vulnerable road-users at a dangerous disadvantage. It subverts our cooperative instincts.

It produces a “need” for traffic lights, to break the priority streams of traffic so side roads and pedestrians can enter or cross.

But traffic lights do not ensure safety. Nearly half of all personal injury “accidents” occur at traffic lights. How many of the remainder are due to priority? The stats don’t tell us. As far as I know, accidents investigators don’t take priority into account.

Priority has a hidden role in our annual road casualty toll of 30,000. In large part, it’s also responsible for the needless delay and added air pollution suffered by a put-upon public.

The harm caused by standard traffic control could be stopped overnight if we replaced priority with equality as the central rule.

Also needed: a new driving test based on equality, and road design that expresses equality.

Equality + Liberty (to think and act as social beings) = Fraternity.

The new one-page rulebook: All road-users are equal. The vulnerable, above all children and blind people, are more equal than others. Give way to other road-users who are there first. Enjoy your day.

Will the traffic control dictatorship, which presides over 30,000 avoidable casualties every year, ever face the consequences of their grotesque system?

Will the racketeers responsible for parking control and speed enforcement ever be called to account?

When pigs fly.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

MPs kowtow to the traffic control dictatorship

On a zoom call in support of a business threatened by proposed new traffic lights near Hereford recently, I was told by a traffic officer that my proposal to make the adjacent collision-prone junctions all-way give-ways would be illegal!

Why? Because the sociable, civilised solution to most of our problems on the road is not in the rulebook. It’s deemed illegal, dismissed out of hand. No discussion.

It’s OK for them to install traffic lights or build roundabouts at vast cost, or subject minor road drivers to mortal danger and indefinite delay, but not OK to create cheap-as-chips all-way give-ways that would eliminate the conflicting speeds that plague priority junctions.

So the system sidesteps challenge and continues to lord it over us. The scandal of traffic management, which presides over an annual peacetime casualty toll of 30,000 human beings, makes the Post Office scandal seem tame by comparison.

The 2004 Traffic Management Act requires traffic authorities to explore all options for improving road safety and congestion. It’s a statutory duty they flout, so ingrained is their ideology; and they get away with it, so deferential or unthinking are our MPs.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Channel Island mystery

Guernsey has filter-in-turn at some junctions. It also has ruettes tranquilles, where the speed limit is 15mph, and pedestrians, horse-riders and cyclists have priority over vehicles. So it was a surprise to see quite a number of traffic lights in the main town of St Peter Port.

Those lights cause the same needless delay, air pollution, conflicting speeds and needs that plague the mainland. Why isn’t filter-in-turn used across the whole island? A mystery. To introduce it would only take some publicity and Give Way signs painted on road surfaces. It would cleanse the air, eliminate stress and delay, and improve quality of life.

To what extent are manufacturers and salesmen of control systems involved in the deployment of traffic lights, those weapons of mass distraction, danger and delay?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Ironies in the fire

It’s bizarre that some see my call for equality-based reform of the traffic system as mad, dangerous or unworkable.

If you were devising the system from scratch, would you make children responsible for their own safety? Or would you put the onus for road safety on the driver?

Would you devise unequal rights-of-way that produce conflicting speeds, and defy common law principles of equal rights and responsibilities?

Yet so ingrained are the current rules of the road that those intrinsically dangerous system components are seen as normal and acceptable.

Presumably my ideas are sometimes seen as odd because I’ve called for the removal of most traffic lights. The call should be seen in connection with my deeper critique of the priority system which produces a “need” for traffic lights.

We “need” traffic lights to break the priority streams of traffic so others can cross or enter, not that lights ensure safety – far from it. So the root problem is the rule of priority (aka unequal rights-of-way). Given equality and freedom to merge more or less in turn, we’d be able to coexist in harmony without the burden of state-sanctioned coercive control.

The current system is anathema to civilised values. It’s a recipe for conflict and grief.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Current system v Equality Streets

Current traffic system = coercive control, conflict, aggression, injustice, harm, misery.

Equality Streets = sociable interaction, cooperation, quality of life and space, happiness.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Slaughterhouse 30,000pa

If I’m right – that the traffic system is intrinsically dangerous, and largely responsible for 30,000 avoidable casualties a year, as well as death and ill-health from poor air quality – then the perpetrators of the system, forever in denial, are guilty of historic abuse and miscarriages of justice on an epic scale. Rather than get away with peacetime crimes against humanity, will they eventually face corporate manslaughter charges?

Roads and traffic might seem trivial compared to higher prestige offices of state such as the Exchequer and Home Office, but we’re all road-users and all detrimentally affected.

By denying appeals on grounds of reason, as in parking and speed enforcement, the system guarantees its survival and insures itself against challenge, just like a totalitarian state. So the extortion rackets continue.

Most regulation makes life on the road a misery when it could be a pleasure. Stimulating individual agency and harnessing instead of hampering human nature would achieve compliance without resentment. 

Get off our case, you bloodsucking traffic authorities, so we can live a better life and save tens of billions for the public purse!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Coercive state control

The state is expected to apologise for enforced adoption, which involved about 186,000 families. When will the state acknowledge, apologise for and above all agree to change the traffic system which for a century and to this day claims 30,000 needless casualties a year?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

BBC Rethink, The City Streets

This episode of BBC Radio 4’s series Rethink, broadcast on 18.6.2026, featured traffic engineer, Keith Firth of NRP; me, Martin Cassini, campaigner for traffic system reform; Sohanna Srinivasan, Urban Planning Design at north Herts Council; and Dutch author, Marco te Brömmelstroet.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Facebook post from 2013

If I’m right: that the edifice of traffic control, based as it is on anti-social priority, is flawed and misguided; and that self-control on streets designed for equality are safer and more efficient than streets governed by priority and signals, what is the nature of the delusion that holds sway, and why does a vast state-sponsored industry uphold it? It’s akin to the power of religion in the Middle Ages. Is it a coincidence that the traffic rulebook is known in the trade as “the bible”?

Comments

Diana Meri

You should see the self control of some of the people I deal with … that kind of mindset, if left to its own devices, would contribute to carnage on our roads. The self regulation and decency one would hope will not happen, because in reality, if unchecked, the hawks will always trump the doves.

Martin

Oh ye of little faith in human nature. In banking and consumer affairs, regulation is needed, because self-interest is driven by profit. On the roads, regulation is redundant because self-interest = the common interest. My interest in not crashing into you mirrors your interest in not crashing into me. Given roads that expressed equality and a social context, you’d need only two rules. Drive on the left; give way to others who were there first, in other words, take it more or less in turns with all fellow road-users, on foot or on wheels. 

Diana

I was run over by someone who self regulated his driving. Lucky to be alive.

Martin

Sorry to hear that. I’ve been hit by a car intent on beating a traffic light, in fact I’ve had three “accidents” at traffic lights. Most “accidents” are not accidents. They are events contrived by the anti-social rules of the road. Of course deregulation is not enough on its own. Also needed: driving test based on equality, culture change/re-education, legal reform, roadway redesign.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment