Tangled up in red

Why stop at a red light? Once you’ve seen one, you’ve seen them all. Seriously, why should we stop when there is no conflicting traffic? Adulthood should be about independence and responsibility. What do traffic lights and speed limits do? Outlaw independent thought and action. Remove responsibility. Infantilise us. Yesterday I had the dubious pleasure of driving through Oxford and Swindon. In Oxford especially, there is hardly a crossing that isn’t governed by traffic lights. They cause continual congestion, block flow, boost emissions, produce great clumps of foreign visitors on traffic islands, gazing up at the lights, hardly daring to move. It’s stupefying that elected councillors and politicians defer to unelected, paid officials, who impose largely counterproductive controls at the expense of our time, health and sanity.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Lights out – “drive with caution!”

Traffic lights are out at Kew Bridge. As usual, the official line is “Drivers are advised to approach with caution”, suggesting that when lights are “working”, we can revert to the officially-sanctioned default mode of driving with neglect.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Extending speed limits

There are plans to reduce speed limits in towns and on rural roads. Like traffic lights, speed limits would be redundant if the rules of the road were based on equality instead of priority, if roads were designed to express a social context, if the onus were on the motorist to beware pedestrians, and if we had a driving test and highway code that embraced these essential reforms. Life is about infinite variables. Speed limits are rigid. Instead of driving by numbers, we should drive according to to context.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Social solutions

I’ve said this before, but if road-user relationships were based on social values – equality based on time of arrival – instead of traffic regulation – priority based on status of road or direction of travel – most of our road safety and congestion problems would vanish in a puff of exhaust smoke.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Ode rage

Andy Andy this is massive
When you play just don’t be passive
Attack attack attack the Fed
Win or lose you’ll still have cred

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Officials v councillors

Reith lecturer, Niall Ferguson, said the rule of law is becoming the rule of lawyers, and citizen power is the only way to stop the rot. Similarly, road regulation has got out of hand with paid officials wielding more power than elected politicians. Time to reclaim our roads from self-serving technocrats!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Harry Potter on common law

In The Strange Case of the Law (BBC2), criminal defence barrister, Harry Potter (who keeps his wig in a Quality Street tin), says that English common law was “this country’s greatest gift to the world”.  Our traffic control system looked that gift of common law, with its values of equal rights and responsibilities, right in the mouth. It replaced it with priority, bringing down decades of death, destruction and waste.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Pedestrian safety v traffic flow?

A letter in today’s Telegraph says pedestrian safety is more important than traffic flow, and longer green time is the only way to improve pedestrian safety. No. Equality is a panacea: with equal rights and responsibilities, road-users coexist as equals. In the intrinsically safe framework created by equality (as distinct from the intrinsically dangerous framework produced by priority), pedestrians no longer go in fear. Free of artificial obstructions in the form of traffic lights, drivers relax. Traffic flows more naturally, and at sociable speeds.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Designing for danger

Traffic officers run a system that’s intrinsically dangerous, then devise expensive controls to mitigate the danger. But inevitably they fail, because all they are doing is treating the symptoms of the problem they created in the first place. If they dealt with the underlying cause of the danger on our roads – unequal priority – they could design for intrinsic safety.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment